SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 1142

R.H.ZAIDI
ABDUL RAUF KHAN – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL SAMAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.AKHTAR HUSSAIN

R. H. ZAIDI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is plaintiffs second appeal, which arises out of a suit for permanent injunction and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 19. 8. 1998 passed by IInd Addl. District Judge, bahraich.

( 2 ) IT appears that the plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for permanent injunction prohibitory and mandatory. It was pleaded that the land in dispute (plot No. 771 measuring. O48 hectare) was allotted to him by the Land Management Committee of Gram Sabha on 24. 8. 1977, he was, on the basis of the said allotment, owner in possession of the land in dispute but on account of his poverty, he could not construct his residential house on the land in dispute that the defendants have forcibly occupied the land in dispute. Plaintiff asked the defendants to vacate the land in dispute ; but in vain, hence the suit.

( 3 ) THE suit was contested by the defendants-respondents who have denied the plaintiffs claim. It was pleaded that the plaintiff had no right to file the suit as he was neither the owner nor in possession of the land in dispute. There existed more than 35 years old house of the defendants on the land in dispute. It was pleaded that land in dispute was never auc













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top