( 1 ) HEARD Sri Pramod Kumar Jain counsel appearing for the petitioner. Sri Pankaj Mittal appears for the respondent No. 2 and he has also been heard.

( 2 ) BY Means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certtorari quashing the orders dated 7. 8. 92 and 15/16. 9. 98 passed by respondent No. 1.

( 3 ) FACTS relevant for this writ petition may be stated in brief. The landlord-respondent No. 2 moved an application under Section 21 (1) (a) of U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972, (hereinafter referred to as the act ). The petitioner-tenant filed written statement denying the landlords need. Parties adduced evidence on affidavits. However, thereafter the petitioner entered into compromise with the landlord admitting therein that the need of the landlord for additional accommodation was genuine and bona fide. She also undertook to vacate the premises in question by 31. 12. 1995 to which the landlord also agreed, it was also provided in the compromise that if the petitioner failed to vacate the house in question by the aforesaid date, the landlord would be entitled to get her evicted in proceedings under Section 23 of the Act. The Prescribed Authority accepte