SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 1185

M.C.AGARWAL
MAYA FOODS AND VANASPATI LTD. , ALLAHABAD – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY (BR), ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SANJIV SINGH, Sankatha Rai

M. C. AGARWAL, J.


( 1 ) BY this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges an order dated 14. 11. 94 passed by the respondent No. 1. I. e. . the Chief Controlling Revenue authority, U. P. , whereby it partly allowed the Stamp Revision No. 294 of 1994-95 and remanded the proceedings to the District Stamp Officer for redetermination of the market value of the land.

( 2 ) 1 have heard Sri Sankatha Rai. learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjlv Slngh, learned standing counsel for the respondents.

( 3 ) THE petitioner M/s. Maya Foods and Vanaspatl Limited purchased land situate in Fatehpur in the State of Uttar Pradesh by three sale deeds dated 8. 1. 93, 11. 1. 93 and 13. 1. 93. The sale deeds were registered at Delhi as the Registration at Delhi was permitted by virtue of Section 30 (2) of the Registration Act, The Registrar, Delhi in compliance with the provisions contained in section 167 of the Registration Act, forwarded the copies of the sale deeds to the Registrar at fatehpur, who was of the opinion that the market value of the property purchased has been under-stated and he made a reference in terms of Section 47a of the Indian Stam
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top