SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 1250

S.K.PHAUJDAR, A.CHAKRABARTI, B.K.ROY
DINESH KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Gaur, A.P.TIWARI, M.M.D.Agrawal, RAKESH DWIVEDI, Ravi Kant, S.S.Tripathi

B. K. ROY, A. CHAKRABARTI, S. K. PHAUJDAR, JJ.

( 1 ) THROUGH this Civil Misc. Review Petition No. 54512 of 1998, filed on 1st September. 1998, review Js sought for of the judgment and order dated 30. 6. 1998 passed by a Full Bench of this court comprising two of us (Binod Kumar Roy and S. K. Phaujdar, JJ.) and Honble Mr. Justice g. S. N. Tripathi, since retired, in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1265 of 1996 (reported in 1998 (3) UPLBEC 1805), the operative part of which reads thus :

" (i) The conversion of 13 posts of direct recruits, as available for promotion from Nyayik Sewa, is declared illegal and the recommendation of the Selection Committee dated 2. 11. 1995 and the resolution of the Full Court dated 18. 11. 1995 in question in this regard are quashed. (ii) The appointees (respondent Nos. 3 to 15) will be deemed to be appointed on ad hoc basis only and not on substantive basis and that too till the final decision on this point to be taken by the Full Court. (iii) The Full Court is requested to consider the question of increase in the number of vacancies from 6 to 19, which was admittedly available as per report of the Selection Committee itself. (iv) Honble the Chief Justice











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top