SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 1312

S.K.PHAUJDAR, J.C.MISHRA
UMESH CHANDRA SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
ADMINISTER GENERAL, U. P. ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SHARMA, B.B.Paul, Manu Saxena, R.K.Pandey, Yasharth

( 1 ) ALL these matters were heard together as the same were connected through a common link of administration of a religious-cum-philanthropic society, named Shri Ram Chandra Mission. It was established by late Shri Ram Chandra Ji Maharaj and, on his death, unfortunately, disputes have arisen regarding his spiritual heirship to control the affairs of the Mission. The disputes have arisen regarding his spiritual heirship to control the affairs of the Mission. The disputes, gave rise to several litigations and the above four are the result of such disputes between the parties.

( 2 ) SPECIAL Appeal No. 829 of 1995 has been filed under the provisions of Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules and in this appeal the judgement and order dated 16-10-1995, passed by Honble single Judge had allowed application No. A-415 filed before him and had rejected the plaint of Testamentary Suit No. 1 of 1994 under Section 7, Rule 11 (a) CPC. The said testamentary suit was filed by Umesh Chandra Saxena and the Administrator General, U. P. were arrayed as defendants. The suit was filed by Umesh Chandra Saxena and others for a letter of administration to Umesh Chandra Saxena in respect of



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top