SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 1368

R.P.NIGAM, A.S.GILL
P. N. SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MISHRA, Shafiq Mirza

AMARBIR SINGH GILL, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the order of his reversion dated 18. 10. 1997 (Annexure- 1a) and consequential posting order dated 20. 10. 1997 (Annexure-1b) on the reverted post. The case of the petitioner is that he joined the service with the opposite parties as Garden Superintendent in, the year 1963. He was promoted as Executive Officer of Class II municipal Board with effect from 1. 12. 1964 and thereafter he was promoted to the post of sahayak Nagar Adhikari with effect from 1. 7. 1979. In the year 1989, he was superseded. He filed a writ petition challenging his supersession and on 29. 1. 1991, this Court directed the opposite parties to decide the representation of the petitioner. However, the opposite parties passed an order stating that since earlier promotion of the petitioner on the post of Sahayak nagar Adhikari was on ad hoc basis, the petitioner cannot be promoted to the next higher post of up Nagar Adhikari. The petitioner challenged the said decision by means of Writ Petition No. 4203 of 1991. This Court passed an interim order directing the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top