SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 182

A.S.TRIPATHI, ALOK KUMAR BASU
TIHUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I.N.Mulla

PALOK BASU, J.


( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed by Tihul and his wife Smt. Ramapati against the conviction and sentence under Section 302/34, I. P. C. passed by II Addl. Sessions Judge, Basti on 23-8-1979 in Sessions trial No. 117 of 1979.

( 2 ) THE charge against the appellants was that both of them in furtherance of common intention, sometimes in the night between 18/ 19/11/1978 inside their house, situated in village - Ratan Purwa, police station - Rudhauli committed the murder by intentionally causing the death of Smt. Ramraj, their sister-in-law (Bhabhi) punishable under Section 302/34, IPC.

( 3 ) APPELLANT Tihul and Ramasrey are brothers, Tihuls wife is appellant Smt. Ramapati, while late Ramasreys wife is Smt. Ramraji, deceased in this case. Both the brothers and their family were living in one and the same house. The cultivation was also joint. Ever since the death of Ramasrey about 11 months ago the deceased Smt. Ramraji was living with her two minor daughters, Km. Phulwa and Km. Gulab in the same house. Km. Phulwa was about 8 years and Km. Gulab 6 years. In the revenue records the name of late Ramraji was continuing for which Smt. Ramraji was making efforts to get her nam



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top