A.S.TRIPATHI, ALOK KUMAR BASU
RAM KISHUN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) RAM Kishun appellant has filed this appeal from Jail against the judgement and order dated 2-2-1988 passed by Sessions Judge, Mirzapur convicting and sentencing him under Section 302, IPC to Imprisonment for life.
( 2 ) SRI Tej Prakas has been appointed Amicus curiae who has argued the case with ability. Sri S. P. Tewari, learned A. G. A. has spoused the cause of the State. The charge against the appellant was that he has committed the murder of his wife by inflicting upon her an injury by an axe and thereby committed the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 IPC.
( 3 ) FROM a perusal of the order sheet it appears that when this case was taken up by Sessions Judge on 21-11-1987 a charge was framed against the appellant under Section 302 IPC and he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. He had no counsel of his own. The case was taken up on 2-2-1988 by the learned Sessions Judge and he had appointed an Amicus curiae to appear for the appellant. The Sessions Judge had only asked the appellant as to how his wife Smt. Banspati was murdered. In reply to the said question the appellant admitted his guilt that he had killed Smt. Banspati. He detailed the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.