SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 141

A.S.TRIPATHI, ALOK KUMAR BASU
RAM KISHUN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
TEJ PRAKASH SHARMA

PALOK BASU, J.

( 1 ) RAM Kishun appellant has filed this appeal from Jail against the judgement and order dated 2-2-1988 passed by Sessions Judge, Mirzapur convicting and sentencing him under Section 302, IPC to Imprisonment for life.

( 2 ) SRI Tej Prakas has been appointed Amicus curiae who has argued the case with ability. Sri S. P. Tewari, learned A. G. A. has spoused the cause of the State. The charge against the appellant was that he has committed the murder of his wife by inflicting upon her an injury by an axe and thereby committed the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 IPC.

( 3 ) FROM a perusal of the order sheet it appears that when this case was taken up by Sessions Judge on 21-11-1987 a charge was framed against the appellant under Section 302 IPC and he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. He had no counsel of his own. The case was taken up on 2-2-1988 by the learned Sessions Judge and he had appointed an Amicus curiae to appear for the appellant. The Sessions Judge had only asked the appellant as to how his wife Smt. Banspati was murdered. In reply to the said question the appellant admitted his guilt that he had killed Smt. Banspati. He detailed the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top