SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 120

J.P.SEMWAL
SINGHAL AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
HUSSAIN ALI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.BHARGAVA, U.N.Sharma, VIJAY RATAN AGARWAL

J. P. SEMWAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 30 of Workmens Compensation Act against the order dated march 2, 1979 passed by the Workmens Compensation Commissioner, Allahabad Region in compensation Case No. 7 of 1978, awarding Rs. 18,000/- as compensation to respondent claimant from the appellant company.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the present appeal may be summarised as below: respondent No. 1 Hussain Ali made an application under Rule 20of Workmens Compensation rules, 1924 before the Workmens Compensation Commissioner, Allahabad for compensation. The claimant Hussain Ali is the father of Manauwar Ali deceased who was employed with the appellant Company. The appellant Company was given contract by the respondent No. 2 IFFCO for construction of residential quarters in IFFCO town, Phulpur. During the course of construction Manauwar Ali was employed by the appellant as visit. On May 12, 1978, manauwar Ali died on account of falling of wall in the course of his employment. The respondent No. 1 is the father of the deceased and as father he made an application under Section 20 of the Workmens Compensation Rules. The copies of the application were sent to the appellant and res
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top