Judgement Key Points

HARI NATH TILHARI, J.

( 1 ) THESE two a writ petitions arise out of same judgment and order and the petitioners have challenged the orders dated 28. 6. 1986, passed by the Prescribed Authority (Ceiling) Balrampur and order dated 27. 4. 1993, delivered by Upper Aayuktya (Addl. Commissioner), Faizabad division, Faizabad in Ceiling Case No. 387 under Section 10 of the Imposition of Ceiling on land Holdings Act and the two appeals arising out of the order of the Prescribed Authority, ceiling, passed in that case, i. e. , Ceiling Appeal No. 333/679 and Ceiling Appeal No. 335/680, gonda under Section 13 of the U. P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act. As the two writ petitions involve same questions of law and arise from same order and involve same fact, both the writ petitions have been heard together and are being disposed off by one common judgment. Writ Petition No. 45 of 1993 is being made leading case.

( 2 ) IT may also be mentioned here that the petitioner Rahmatullah of Writ Petition No. 45 of 1993 is the respondent in the writ petition, filed by Smt. Khatoon Nisa i. e. , Writ Petition No. 57 of 1993 while Smt. Khatoon Nisa has been arrayed as opposite party no. 4 in Writ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document