SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 287

S.P.SRIVASTAVA
JAGDISH NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shanker Suan

S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.


( 1 ) THE petitioner filed a revision under Section 56 of the Indian Stamp Act before the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority challenging an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner (Stamps), respondent No. 2 raising a demand of Rs. 70,000. 00 towards the deficiency in stamp duty and penalty thereon on a re-determination of the corrrectness of the market value of the property which was the subject matter of the sale deed in respect of the vacant land executed in favour of the petitioner which re-determination took place in the proceedings under Section 47a of the Indian Stamp Act as applicable to the State of U. P.

( 2 ) ALONG with the aforesaid revision the petitioner filed an application for interim relief praying that during the pendency of the revision, recovery of the amount in dispute be stayed. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, respondent No. 1 vide its order dated 3-2-1994, while admitting the revision for hearing, granted an interim order of stay whereunder the recovery proceedings for the realisation of the amount of penalty was stayed in full but the respondent No. 1 stayed the recovery of only half of the stamp duty payable under the order i
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top