SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 383

S.K.VERMA, B.M.LAL
MUKUL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MAHESH GAUTAM, VIJAY GAUTAM

S. K. VERMA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitions through this writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India prays for a direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 3-3-1994 issued by the respondent No. 2 in favour of respondent No. 4 and for a mandamus directing respondents No. 1 to 3 to accept the only tender of the petitioner holding it as valid.

( 2 ) THE petitioner had been operating the contract for cycle/scooter stand at Aligarh Junction Railway station for the last four years. His contract was to expire on 23-3-1994. Meanwhile on 9-12-1993, a tender notice was issued inviting tenders for the contract for the next two years, i. e. 1994-95 and 1995-96. Three persons offered their tenders, namley, H. K. Dubey, N. K. Singh, respondent No. 4 and Mukul Kumar, petitioner. Their offers were Rs. 1,29,000. 00 Rs. 2,97,000. 00, and Rs. 1,47,000. 00 respectively. The tender notices required deposit of earnest money and also certain documents. The petitioner claims that the tender notice (Annexure 1 to the writ petition) mentioned that no tender will be considered if it is not accompanied with documents mentioned in the notice. The other two persons did not submit the d



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top