SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 422

S.C.MOHAPATRA, ABDUR RAHIM
ANSARA BEGUM – Appellant
Versus
HARNAM SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Saxena, RAJENDRA KUMAR, S.K.VERMA

S. C. MOHAPATRA, ABDUR RAHIM, JJ.

( 1 ) THESE three appeals under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) are in respect of death of two persons in an accident while going on a motor cycle. Since the three appeals arise out of common judgment and involve same question they are heard together and are disposed of by this judgment.

( 2 ) ON 19. 4. 1977 Nizam Ali, an employee of a fertilizer store, was going on his motor cycle with ahmad Husain. Nizam Ali was driving the motor cycle and Ahmad Husain was pillion rider. Motor cycle collided with truck No. UTF 1359 which was coming from the opposite direction. As a result of this accident Ahmad Husain, the pillion rider, died on the spot sustaining fatal injuries. Nizam Ali who also sustained severe injuries was removed to hospital for treatment where he died later.

( 3 ) ASSERTING that accident was on account of negligence in driving of the truck, widow of Nizam ali and their minor daughter aged two years filed an application for compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/ -. Widow and four daughters of Ahmad Husain claimed compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/in a separate claim application. Mother and two sisters




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top