SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 504

S.C.MOHAPATRA, A.RAHIM
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.S.SRIVASTAVA, VINIT SAREN

S. C. MOHAPATRA, J.

( 1 ) INSURER is appellant in this appeal under Section 178 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) ON 23-10-1989 Maruti Van No. DDV 467 dashed against a tree as a result of which Murari Singh, an occupant of the Car sustained fatal injuries and expired. Murari was employed as driver of the Car. Claimants, who are widow and minor son of the deceased filed application for compensation.

( 3 ) INSURER contested the claim on the ground that driver of the Vehicle having himself been negligent, claim by dependants under the Act is not sustainable. Added to it insurer asserted that claim is excessive and claimants are entitled in the maximum to compensation as provided under the Workmens Compensation Act.

( 4 ) TRIBUNAL on appreciation of materials on record held that dependants are entitled to compensation under the Act and awarded compensation of Rs. 1,85,000. 00. This is grievance of appellant.

( 5 ) WHEN the appeal was listed for admission, notice of admission was issued where it was indicated that appeal may be finally disposed of at the time of admission. Pursuant to notice claimant respondents have entered appearance and appe









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top