The court emphasized the importance of considering the requirements of Section 19 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, for putting the obligation on the defendant-father-in-law to maintain the plaintiff-daughter-in-law.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act against decree directing payment of maintenance at the rate of Rs. 500. 00 per month by the appellant. Case of plaintiff-respondent is that she is widow of the son of appellant. Appellant, despite, approach, is not maintaining her or permitting her to reside in the famine house. On the other hand appellant has deposited compensation amount of Rs. 10,000. 00 in his name depriving the widow-plaintiff from the same. Therefore, she is residing with her brother at Kanpur. In this circumstance direction should be given to defendant for granting maintenance to her. Case of defendant is that marriage of his deceased son with plaintiff is void under Hindu Marriage Act and as such he has no obligation to maintain her. Besides plaintiff is residing with her parents and is being maintained by them for which he has no obligation to maintain her.

( 2 ) LEARNED trial Judge held that plaintiff is daughter-in-law of defendant and is residing with her brother and accordingly, defendant is to maintain her. On this finding he has directed payment of Rs. 500. 00 per month towards maintenance. This is grievance of the appellant.

( 3 ) LIABILITY of a father-in-law to maintain daughter-in-law arises from statutory provisions> contained in S. 19 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. It reads as follows:-"section 19 maintenance of widowed daughter-in-law:- (1) A Hindu wife whether married before or after the commencement of this Act, shall be entitled to be maintained after the death of her husband by her father-in-law: provided and to the extent that she is unable to maintain herself out of her own earnings or other property or, whether she has no property of her own, is unable to obtain maintenance- (a) from the estate of her husband or her father or mother, or (b) from her son or daughter, if any, or his or her estate. (2) Any obligation under sub-section (1) shall not be enforceable if the father-in-law has not the means to do so from any coparcenary property in his possession out of which the daughter-in-law has not obtained any share, and any such obligation shall cease on the remarriage of the daughter-in-law. "bare perusal indicates that father-in-law has an obligation to maintain widowed daughter-in-law whether the daughter-in-law is unable to maintain herself out of her own earnings or other property or, where she has no property of her own, is unable to obtain maintenance from the estate of her husband or her father or mother. Apart from other things, obligation of father-in-law shall not be enforceable if the father-in-law has not the means to do so from any coparcenary property in his possession out of which the daughter-in-law has not obtained any share.

( 4 ) IN order to give direction to father-in- law to discharge obligation, Family court is required to give clear finding that the daughter-in-law plaintiff is unable to maintain herself out of her own earnings or other property or, where she has no property of her own she is unable to obtain maintenance from the estate of her husband or her father or mother and father-in-law has means to discharge obligation from any coparcenary property in his possession out of which plaintiff daughter-in-law has not obtained any share. On perusal of the judgment we find that trial court has not considered the requirements of Section 19 to be satisfied for putting the obligation on defendant-father-in-law to maintain the plaintiff-daughter-in-law. Order is, therefore, vulnerable.

( 5 ) UNDER Section 19 one of the conditions for the father-in-law to maintain the daughter-in-law is that the daughter-in-law, is not able to maintain herself from the estate of her parents. A clear finding is necessary whether her parents have estate sufficient to maintain her and on what circumstances she is unable to maintain herself or by her parents. For this purpose parents of plaintiff are required to be heard. This is possible if they are mad