SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 610

S.R.SINGH, G.S.N.TRIPATHI
STRAW BOARD MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Janardan Sahai, VIKRAM GULATI

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) THE writ petition initially filed on 5-2-1991 was for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to refund the excise duty paid by the petitioner under protest during the period from 3-7-1971 to 28-2-1986. It also claimed for interest at the rate of 18% on the amount of duty liable to be refunded. It is not disputed that the petitioner has applied for refund of excise duty pursuant to the order dated 17-10-1989 of Custom Excise Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, new Delhi passed in Appeal No. E/1238/85-C. The application for refund was rejected vide order dated 9-11-1990, a copy of which has been annexed to the supplementary affidavit dated 19-4-1991. The said order was communicated to the petitioner vide covering letter dated 7-2-1991 and it was in fact received by them on 11-2-1991. This order has been brought on record by means of an application dated Nil filed on 29-4-1991 along with supplementary affidavit dated 19-4-1991 and amendment application has been filed today seeking relief for issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 9-11-1990/7-2-1991 passed by the assistant Collector, Central Excise, Sa






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top