SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 680

S.R.SINGH
CHANDRIKA RAI – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, GHAZIPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.B.Garg, Sankatha Rai


S. R. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) PRESENT petition is directed against the judgment and orders dated 12-3-1992 and 20-11-1992 passed by Settlement Officer, Consolidation Ghazipur and Dy. Director of Consolidation Ghazipur respectively, the genesis of which is owed to the proceedings for allotment of Chak under Section 20 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (in short the act ). It would transpire that the respondent No. 4- Rishikesh was not provided with the facility of a Chak road to facilitate his access to his chak and accordingly, on publication of statement of proposal, he filed objection under Section 20 of the Act staking demand to the facility of a Chak road and upon the objection, being rejected by the Consolidation Officer, the respondent No. 4 preferred, an appeal before the Settlement Officer, Consolidation under Section 21 of the Act reiterating his demand which has been summed in the appellate order in the following words :-"appealkarta Ki Mang Hei Ki Gata Sankhiya 466 Jis Per Appealkarta Ka Chak Bana Hei Tetha Ye Gata Uski Abadi Ke Sameep He Vahaan So Gata Sankhiya 600 Tak Jahaan Tak Appealkarta Ka Chak Bana Hai, Nali Ke Saath Saath Chak Road Prastavit Kiya Jave. "

( 2











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top