SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 682

R.B.MEHROTRA, S.K.PHAUJDAR
UMAKANT YADAV – Appellant
Versus
SUPERINTENDENT OF DISTRICT JAIL, AZAMGARH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DAYA SHANKAR MISHRA

R. B. MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) BY means of the present habeas corpus petition, the petitioner has challenged his detention in District Jail, Azamgarh and has also prayed for quashing of the first information report dated 11-9-1993, on the basis of which a case Crime No. 86/1993 has been registered against the petitioner for investigation of an offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioner under Section 3 (1) of U. P. Gangesters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (U. P. Act No. 7 of 1986) (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) THE first information report dated 11-9-1993, which is sought to be quashed in the present proceedings, is to be looked into for the purposes of examining the contentions raised by the petitioners counsel seeking its quashing.

( 3 ) THE first information report has been filed by the Station Officer, Didarganj, district Azamgarh. The report reads, that the records available in Police Station Didarganj, have been looked into and from the perusal of the aforesaid records, it is borne out that the accused, Umakant Yadav S/o Sri Sripat Yadav r/o village, Sarawa, Police Station Didarganj, district, Azamgarh has a criminal gang and he is the












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top