SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 101

R.K.GULATI, OM PRAKASH
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
M. S. J. (ENGG. AND CO. ) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.S.NIGAM, RAKESH RANJAN AGRAWAL

OM PRAKASH, J.

( 1 ) THE Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench a), has referred the following questions under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (briefly, "the Act"), for the opinion of this court : " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the Income-tax Officer had exercised his discretion in not charging interest under section 217 (1a) in the original assessment ?

( 2 ) WHETHER, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that interest under Section 217 (1a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, could not be charged by taking recourse to Section 154 ?" 2. The relevant assessment year is 1972-73. The assessee, a partnership firm, carried on the business of manufacture and sale of earth digging equipment and it also derived income from government contracts. During the financial year 1971-72, relevant to the assessment year 1972-73, the assessee was required to pay advance tax of Rs. 3,830 under Section 210 of the Act, which was computed on the basis of income of Rs. 55,640 for the assessment year 1970-71. On regular assessment, the total income of the assessee and the tax













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top