V.K.KHANNA
GUR PRASAD SHYAM BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) CIVIL Revision No. 20 of 1990 connected with Civil Revisions Nos. 68, 69 and 70 of 1990 have been filed against the order of the Civil Judge, Etawah in four connected suits on four applications moved by the plaintiff-opposite party State Bank of India for setting aside the four orders dated 21-8-1987 passed under Order 11, Rule 11, C. P. C. As all the four revisions raise similar facts and questions of law the same are being disposed of by a common order.
( 2 ) BRIEF facts for the purposes of deciding the aforesaid revisions are that the plaintiff-respondent No. 1, State Bank of India, filed four suits in the year 1986 against the defendants for recovery of money which had been advanced to the defendants on the basis of agreements which had been executed between the parties. Applications were moved in the suit by the defendants numbered as 31-C on the ground that the plaintiff has filed suit for recovery of money against the defendants and in the plaint has mentioned about the agreement and the mortgage which are the basis of the suit and those documents have not been filed. It was mentioned that without seeing those papers it was not possible for the defendan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.