SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 326

V.K.KHANNA
GUR PRASAD SHYAM BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAKESH PORVAL, Satya Din

V. K. KHANNA, J.


( 1 ) CIVIL Revision No. 20 of 1990 connected with Civil Revisions Nos. 68, 69 and 70 of 1990 have been filed against the order of the Civil Judge, Etawah in four connected suits on four applications moved by the plaintiff-opposite party State Bank of India for setting aside the four orders dated 21-8-1987 passed under Order 11, Rule 11, C. P. C. As all the four revisions raise similar facts and questions of law the same are being disposed of by a common order.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts for the purposes of deciding the aforesaid revisions are that the plaintiff-respondent No. 1, State Bank of India, filed four suits in the year 1986 against the defendants for recovery of money which had been advanced to the defendants on the basis of agreements which had been executed between the parties. Applications were moved in the suit by the defendants numbered as 31-C on the ground that the plaintiff has filed suit for recovery of money against the defendants and in the plaint has mentioned about the agreement and the mortgage which are the basis of the suit and those documents have not been filed. It was mentioned that without seeing those papers it was not possible for the defendan









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top