SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 309

A.P.MISRA, G.P.MATHUR, S.P.SRIVASTAVA
WAHID ULLAH KHAN – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NAINITAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Raisul Hasan Zaidi

A. P. MISRA,J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to the present petition are as follows :-by means of the present petition petitioner Wahid Ullah Khan had challenged the resolution dated 22/12/1990, by which no confidence motion had been passed against the petitioner who was the elected President of the Municipal Board, Khatima, district Nainital. It is not disputed that the total strength of the members of the Board is 15. It is also not disputed that the petitioner was elected as President of the Board. Respondents Nos. 4 to 11 served a notice under S. 87a of the U. P. Municipalities Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act, expressing their intention to move a motion of no confidence against the petitioner before the District Magistrate, Nainital. This notice was given on 19/11/1990.

( 3 ) ON 4-12-1990 the District Magistrate issued a notice to the members of the Municipal Board which was dispatched from Nainital on 6-12-1990 whereby 22nd December, 1990 was fixed for consideration of motion of no confidence. In pursuance of the notice issued by the District Magistrate a meeting of the Municipal Board was held on 22/1




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top