SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 368

B.C.SAKSENA
SANT RAM AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
CIVIL JUDGE, MOHANLAL GANJ, LUCKNOW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C.GUPTA, S.K.MEHROTRA

B. C. SAKSENA, J.


( 1 ) THIS petition is directed against an order dated 3-10-1992, passed in Civil Appeal No. 107 of 1990 Sant Ram Agarwal v. Smt. Ram Dei and others. The petitioner had filed an application numbered as 27-A and sought amendment in the written statement, filed by him in suit No. 229 of 1987. The said application for amendment was rejected by the aforesaid order dated 3-10-1992.

( 2 ) IT may also be relevant to indicate that suit No. 29 of 1987 was decided by the learned Munsiff, South, Lucknow on the 26th of July, 1990. The application for amendment was moved at the time of the hearing of the appeal arising from the judgment in the said suit. By the said application for amendment 18 paragraphs were sought to be added to the written statement.

( 3 ) PRESENT opposite parties 2 to 4 had filed suit No. 29 of 1987 on the allegation that in the night intervening 24- 25/12/1986 the petitioner had blocked main door of premises No. 86/248 Ka Mohalla Kurmi Tola Lal Kunwan Lucknow and had covered the area measuring 13 x 12 situated in front of the aforesaid door into a room and has fixed exit door in it. The allegation further was that the petitioner took forcible possession o


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top