IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
M. L. Bhat, J.
GANGA DEVI - Appellant
Versus
C.B.JOSHI - Respondents
First Appeal 806 Of 1991
Decided On : 10/01/1993
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 - SECTION 25 - MAINTENANCE - WIFE ENTITLED TO MAINTENANCE DESPITE DESERTION - UNCHASTITY NOT PROVED - WIFE HAS NO PROPERTY OF HER OWN - HUSBAND DIRECTED TO PAY RS. 400/- PER MONTH AS PERMANENT ALIMONY.
Fact of the Case:
The wife filed a divorce petition against the husband, which was granted on the ground of desertion. The wife also sought maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which was rejected by the trial court on the ground that the wife was unchaste and had deserted the husband.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the wife was entitled to maintenance despite desertion as the ground of unchastity was not proved. The court also held that the wife had no property of her own and the husband was directed to pay Rs. 400/- per month as permanent alimony.
Issues: Whether the wife is entitled to maintenance despite desertion.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 provides that the court may grant maintenance to a wife if she is unable to maintain herself. The court held that the wife was entitled to maintenance as she had no property of her own and the husband was able to pay.
Final Decision: The High Court allowed the appeal and directed the husband to pay Rs. 400/- per month as permanent alimony to the wife.
( 1 ) THE respondent had filed a divorce petition against the appellant, which was granted on 27-9-1983. It was held by the Court below that the appellant had deserted the respondent and she did not want to live with the respondent, therefore, the marriage between the parties be terminated. The respondent had also raised a ground of mental cruelty for seeking divorce. This ground was based on the allegation of unchastity against the appellent, who was alleged to have told the respondent, her husband, on the very first day of marriage that she was having sexual relations with some third person, who was named in the divorce petition and she treated that man as her husband and did not allow the respondent to consummate the marriage with her. However, this plea was disbelieved by the Court below and it was held that the respondent-husband has failed to prove mental cruelty as alleged by him. Therefore, the ground for divorce of mental cruelty had failed. At the time of passing of the decree, the Trial Court did not pass any order with regard to alimony and it was observed that the question of maintenance allowance to the wife could be considered when application under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act is made by her.
( 2 ) AFTER decreeing the suit the wife seems to have made an application for payment of maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act. That application was rejected by the court below on 24-4-1988. The appellant-wife challenges the order of the Court below and prays that the order under appeal be set aside.
( 3 ) COURT below is influenced by the allegtions levelled by the husband against the appellant-wife regarding her unchastity. The unchastity is taken as a ground for refusing the maintenance allowance. The Court below has also said that the appellant-wife has deserted the husband, therefore, it will not be proper to allow permanent alimony to the wife. According to the Court below the appellant had played a drama of marriage and she could not be entitled to permanent alimony.
( 4 ) SECTION 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act was referred by the learned Counsel for the parties. Section 25 of the Act provides that at the time of passing any decree or at any time subsequent thereto, if the application is made for the purpose of permanent alimony by either the wife or the husband as the case may be, for payment of alimony the Court can grant maintenance having regard to the respondents income and other property, if any, the income and other property of the applicant, the conduct of the parties and other circumstances of the case and alimony may be granted which may appear to the Court to be just and such payment may be secured, if necessary, by a charge on the immovable property of the other side. However, if there is any change in the circumstances of either party at anytime after an order is made, the Court may at the instance of either party, vary, modify or rescind any such order in such manner as the Court may deem just. If after passings of the order the Court is satisfied that the party in whose favour an order for alimony was made has remarried or if such party is the wife, she has not remained chaste or if such party is the husband, he has had sexual intercourse with any woman outside wedlock, it may at the instance of the other party vary, modify or rescind such other in such manner as it may deem just.
( 5 ) FROM reading the provisions, of Section 25 of the Act the Court has to consider the circumstances as also the income of the party claiming alimony and the income of the party from whom alimony is claimed and it may vary the alimony order after passing the order if the circumstances are changed or if the wife has resorted to unchastity or the husband has indulged in adultery. Therefore, each case has to be decided on its own merits. The learned Counsel for the respondent has submitted that the wife has deserted the husband, therefore, she is not entitled to get any maintenance. It is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.