SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 173

A.B.SRIVASTAVA
RAM RATAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.SINGH


A. B. SRIVASTAVA, J, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this application under Section 482 of the Cr. P. C. the applicants have prayed for quashing the F. I. R. dated 13/10/1991, registered as Crime No. 3190f 1991, under Section 307 I. P. C. at Police Station Shasni, district Aligarh, staying their arrest, and for directing the criminal courts at Aligarh to consider and dispose of their bail application on the same day as they surrender before the said courts.

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, investigation in respect of the aforesaid First Information Report is being carried on by the concerned Police Station and no charge-sheet has yet been submitted.

( 3 ) THE question arising, therefore, is whether the application for the reliefs mentioned above is maintainable at this stage under Section 482 of the Cr. P. C. The learned counsel for the applicants who has been heard at length at the admission stage, has contended that the application under Section 482 Cr. P. C. is maintainable, on the allegations made by the applicants, for all the reliefs claimed. Alternatively, it is contended that the petition is maintainable at least for the relief of a direction to the courts concerned to hear and dispose of the bail pl











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top