SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 166

D.P.S.CHAUHAN
SURENDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
S. D. O. NAGINA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL SHARMA, R.H.Zaidi

D. P. S. CHAUHAN, J.


( 1 ) BY means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 24-1-1991 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Nagina, in the capacity as Election Tribunal under the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking relief for its quashing.

( 2 ) THE petitioners election as Pradhan of Gaon Sabha, Rafayatpur Khulas, District Bijnor (hereinafter referred to as the Gaon Sabha) was challenged by one Sri Sarad Kumar Gahlot by means of an election petition presented before the respondent No. 1 (numbered as Election Petition No. 63 of 1988 ). The Election Tribunal on the basis of the pleadings framed the issues. Before the issues could be decided the election petitioner moved an application on 15-7-1988 for inspection of ballot papers, which was resisted by the respondent No. 1 in the election petition, the returned candidate. The election petitioner on 13-4-1988 moved another application for inspection/recounting of ballot papers, which, in spite of resistence by the respondent No. 1 in election petition, was allowed on 24-1-1991 and the following order was passed :- "as the evidence of both the parties has been









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top