SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 154

M.KATJU
MOHD. RAUF-UL-AZAM – Appellant
Versus
VICE-CHANCELLOR ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dilip Gupta, Gopal Chandra Saxena

M. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a student of Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. He gave his B. A. III year Examination, 1991 in respect of which he received a charge sheet on 31-7-91 alleging use of unfair means. True copy of the charge sheet is Annexure 1 to the writ petition. A perusal of the said charge sheet shows that the allegation against the petitioner is that he had inserted pre-written sheets inside the title covers of the copies in two papers. The petitioner submitted his reply to the said charges. True copy of the reply is Annexure 2 to the writ petition. Subsequently an order dated 26-10-91 (Annexure 3 to the petition) has been communicated to the petitioner in which it is stated that the petitioners B. A. III year result for 1990-91 is cancelled and he is debarred from appearing at the examination up to 1993. The petitioner has challenged the said order by means of the present writ petition.

( 2 ) COUNTER Affidavit and rejoinder affidavit have been filed. I have heard Shri Shyam Narain for the petitioner and Shri Dileep Gupta, learned counsel for the respondents.

( 3 ) SHRI Dileep Gupta produced before me the answer copy and he contended that the petitioner had i






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top