SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 308

M.KATJU
UMA SHANKAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR OF COOP. SOCIETIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kripa Shankar

M. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) IN this case on December 13, 1990 this Court granted three weeks to the Standing Counsel to file counter-affidavit. Thereafter on January 23, 1991 one months time was again granted to file counter-affidavit. No counter-affidavit was filed despite these orders, and on April 6, 1992 I directed the petitioner to serve respondent Nos. 1 and 2 personally. The petitioner has filed his affidavit of service showing service on these respondents. No counter-affidavit has been filed even today. I am not inclined to grant any further lime to file counter-affidavit as time has been granted repeatedly since December 13, 1990. It seems that the orders of this Court are not taken seriously by the Standing Counsel and despite several opportunities counter-affidavits are not filed for the reasons best known to the State.

( 2 ) IN the circumstances, I am treating the allegations in the petitioner to be correct, and I am proceeding to dispose of this petition finally.

( 3 ) THE petitioner was appointed as Co-operative Inspector, Group II by the order dated February 11, l980 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition ). Subsequently, he was transferred as Managing director, Meerut Farmers Serv









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top