SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 348

VINEET SARAN
ISSMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.L.GAUR

V. SARAN, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS Issma, Prem, Palla alias Yashpal, Ram Kumar and Rakam Singh are involved in Crime No. 7a of 1992 of P. S. Titron, District Saharanpur, under Sections 147, 452, 324, 323, 504, 506 and 308 i. P. C. There are cross cases and injuries have been received on both sides. The writ petition is for quashing the First Information Report and investigation and a further prayer has been orally advanced that in any case the petitioners be admitted bail the same day.

( 2 ) AFTER hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Standing Counsel, I do not find that it is a fit case for exercising discretion under Article 226 of the Constitution to quash the First Information Report and the investigation of the present case.

( 3 ) THE learned Counsel for the petitioners has requested that, the bail application of the petitioners may be considered the same day when they surrender and make an application for bail. It is submitted by the learned Counsel that the bail applications are not disposed of the same day in the District Courts when the accused surrenders and marks an application for bail. The bail application remain pending for a week or even

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top