SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 397

OM PRAKASH
NAWAB KHAN – Appellant
Versus
VISHWANATH SHASTRI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Khare, R.K.JAIN

OM PRAKASH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by the respondent under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (briefly the Act) that the election petition filed by the petitioner be dismissed under Section 86 of the Act for non compliance of the provisions of Section 81 of the Act. The election of the respondent to the Parliament from 50, Ghazipur Parliamentary constituency in which the poll was held on 20/05/1991, has been challenged by the petitioner who also filed his nomination to contest from the aforesaid constituency but his name did not appear in the list of contesting candidates on the ground that his nomination was withdrawn, though according to the petitioner the fact was that he never withdrew his nomination.

( 2 ) IT is contended by the respondent that Section 81 of the Act is mandatory whereunder an election petition may be presented only to the High Court by any candidate or any elector but the instant election petition was presented by the petitioner to the Registrar of the High Court on 15/07/1991. It is averred that the presentation of the election petition to the Registrar under Rule 3, Chapter XV-A of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 (for short, the rules) i
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top