O.P.PRADHAN
PREM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 6. 5. 1992 passed by the Special Judge (Dacoity Affected Areas), Etah, whereby charges against the revisionists under sections 365, 368, 302/149 and 201, I. P. C. were framed.
( 2 ) FACTUAL matrix of the case is simple. The revisionists along with co-accused Satish Chand and Mahesh are standing trial in the Court of the Special Judge (D. A. A.), Etah in Sessions Trial No. 124 of 1991 for the offences under sections 365, 368, 302/149 and 201, I. P. C. The charges against these accused persons were framed by the learned Judge on 6/5/1992 for the said offences. All the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Feeling aggrieved by the framing of charges against them, the revisionists preferred this revision in this Court.
( 3 ) WHEN this revision was taken up for admission on 24/7/1992, this Court had granted time upto 28. 7. 1992 to enable the learned counsel of the revisionists to move the trial court for separating the trial of accused Sanjiv alias Chhabi Ram on the ground that he is a juvenile. The proceedings of the trial was also directed to be stayed till 28/7/1992. In pursuance of this order, an appl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.