SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 520

O.P.PRADHAN
PREM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


O. P. PRADHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 6. 5. 1992 passed by the Special Judge (Dacoity Affected Areas), Etah, whereby charges against the revisionists under sections 365, 368, 302/149 and 201, I. P. C. were framed.

( 2 ) FACTUAL matrix of the case is simple. The revisionists along with co-accused Satish Chand and Mahesh are standing trial in the Court of the Special Judge (D. A. A.), Etah in Sessions Trial No. 124 of 1991 for the offences under sections 365, 368, 302/149 and 201, I. P. C. The charges against these accused persons were framed by the learned Judge on 6/5/1992 for the said offences. All the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. Feeling aggrieved by the framing of charges against them, the revisionists preferred this revision in this Court.

( 3 ) WHEN this revision was taken up for admission on 24/7/1992, this Court had granted time upto 28. 7. 1992 to enable the learned counsel of the revisionists to move the trial court for separating the trial of accused Sanjiv alias Chhabi Ram on the ground that he is a juvenile. The proceedings of the trial was also directed to be stayed till 28/7/1992. In pursuance of this order, an appl








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top