SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(All) 583

SURYA PRASAD
MOHAMMAD DAOOD QURESHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DAYA SHANKAR MISHRA

SURYA PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a criminal revision against the judgment and order dated 12-2-92 passed by the learned Special Judge, Moradabad in Session Trial No. 748-A/84 State v. Mohammad Daood under Ss. 394/397, I. P. C. Police Station Hajrat Nagar Garhi, District Moradabad.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this criminal revision briefly stated are as under :-THE revisionist Mohammad Daood Qureshi was one of the accused in Session Trial No. 748/84 State v. Asad. During trial Mohammad Daood Qureshi absconded. Consequently his case was separated from the original Session Trial No. 748/84 and was numbered as Session Trial No. 748-A/84 state v. Daood. The revisionist Mohammad Daood Qureshi was charged under Ss. 394/397, I. P. C. in Session Trial No. 748-A/84. After framing charges, he absconded. He was, however, arrested in Bombay in connection with N. D. and P. S. Special Case No. 801/89 State (D. C. B. C. I. D.) v. Mohd. Daood. He moved several applications before the Special Judge, Moradabad, who ultimately passed an order under S. 267, Cr. P. C. and the b-Warrant in Form No. 36 was sent to Bombay. Consequently the revisionist Mohd. Daood, who was confined at the relevant time in

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top