SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(All) 146

M.M.LAL, V.P.MATHUR
CHHOTEY LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


V. P. MATHUR, J.


( 1 ) OUT of the three appellants, Chhotey Lal and Manik Chand are real brother, being sons of Ram Bharos and are residents of village Tirhara. Police Station Manjhanpur, district Allahabad, and Lakhan son of Saddhu is kewat by caste and belongs to village Alpika Puni, pertaining to the same Thana. All the three have been convicted on a charge under Section 302 read with sec. 34 I. P. C. and sentenced to Imprisonment for life by Mr. K. P. Asthana, the then 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Allahabad, vide his order dated 4. 9. 1978 passed in Session Trial No. 491 of 1976, feeling aggrieved, they have now come up in appeal.

( 2 ) THE deceased of this case was one Ram Chandra Dwivedi, who was the uncle of the appellants Chhotey Lal and Manik Chand. During consolidation operations, it appears, am agricultural field fell to the share of these three persons. Half of it belonged to the two appellants and the remaining half to Ram Chandra Dwivedi but it appears that Chhotey Lal and Manik Chand were in exclusive possession of the whole and though Ram Chandra was asking them to agree to a partition, they were not prepared. A month prior to this incident there was a quarrel bet





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top