SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(All) 100

N.N.MITHAL, B.N.MISRA
ORIENTAL FIRE AND GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA KAUR – Respondent


N. N. MITHAL, J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal under S. 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has been challenged by the Insurance Company as well as the owner of the vehicle in a joint appeal.

( 2 ) A preliminary objection has been taken as to the maintainability of the appeal on the ground that a joint appeal by the insurer and the insured is not legally maintainable. It is also urged that no award having been made against the owner of the vehicle. he was not a person aggrieved and as such was not entitled to file the appeal. The claimants learned counsel seeks support to his submission from a Division Bench decision of this Court in United India Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Gulab Chandra Gupta, 1985 Acc CJ 245. In that case, two appeals had been filed against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under which the entire amount was made payable by the insurer. One appeal was filed jointly by the owner of the vehicle and the Insurance Company while the other appeal had been filed by the owner of the vehicle alone. The appeal filed by the owner was dismissed on the ground that he was not an aggrieved person since the entire amount














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top