SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(All) 55

A.P.MISRA, R.K.GULATI
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX – Appellant
Versus
RAJ NARAIN PRATAP NARAIN (HUF) – Respondent


R. K. GULATI, J.


( 1 ) THESE are two connected applications under Section 27 (3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (for short "the Act"), filed by the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Agra, relating to the assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80.

( 2 ) IN the wealth-tax assessments for the aforesaid two years, the assessing officer determined the fair market value of an immovable property described as "dehradun property" at Rs. 7,35,086 as on the two valuation dates relevant for the years in dispute. After the completion of those assessments, the Commissioner of Wealth-tax initiated proceedings under Section 25 (2) of the act, calling upon the assessee to show cause why the wealth-tax assessment orders for the years in dispute may not be cancelled, so as to be made afresh as the "dehradun property" had been undervalued by the assessing officer. It appears that, after the completion of the assessments, the assessing officer learnt that the property was sold by the assessee on August 18, 1983, for a consideration of Rs. 36 lakhs and this information prompted the Commissioner to take proceedings under Section 25 (2) of the Act.

( 3 ) AFTER considering the objections filed by the assessee, the Commi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top