V.P.MATHUR
VINOD CHANDRA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH PATHAK – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS first appeal from order, passed by Mr. R. S. Tripathi, the then Vth Additional District Judge, on 19-1-84, in Misc. Case No. 39 of 1983, is directed against an order granting permanent alimony under S. 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, to the respondent.
( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the proceedings for a decree of divorce were going on in the court below between the parties at the instance of the husband Vinod Chandra Sharma. The learned Additional District Judge dismissed the petition for divorce on 19-1-84 and by the present impugned order of the same date he passed the order granting Rs. 350/- per month as permanent alimony in favour of the wife and against the husband. It is contended that this order is patently illegal and cannot be allowed to stand.
( 3 ) I have heard the learned counsel on both the sides. Permanent alimony and maintenance under S. 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act can only be granted if divorce is granted but not during the subsistence of the marriage. The word decree is used in matrimonial cases in a special sense different from that in which it is used in the Civil P. C. The use of the word decree in S. 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act means t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.