SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 462

N.L.GANGULY, R.N.RAY
MADAN RAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.D.Giri, Gajender Pratap, Krishna J.Khare, P.N.MISHRA, RAVINDRA RAI, Y.K.Shukla

N. L. GANGULY, J.


( 1 ) THE appellants Madan Rai and three others tried by the Sessions Judge, Ghazipur in S. T. No. 150 of 1984 were convicted as under : Accused Madan Rai was convicted under Sec. 302, I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment of life and convicted and sentenced to two years R. I. under Section 440, I. P. C. and a fine of Rs. 500. 00. In default of payment of fine, R. I. for three years.

( 2 ) APPELLANTS Sachidanand Rai, Ras Behari Rai alias Panda and Janardan Rai were convicted under Section 440, I. P. C. and sentenced to two years R. I. and a fine of Rs. 500. 00. In default of payment of fine, three months R. I. All the sentences to run concurrently.

( 3 ) GOVERNMENT Appeal No. 2166 of 1985 is directed against the same judgment and order against the acquittal of the appellants Ras Behari Rai alias Panda, Sachidanand Rai and Janardan Rai under Sections 302/34, I. P. C.

( 4 ) THE occurrence took place on 11/05/1984 at about 6. 30 p. m. in village Lauwadih P. S. Bhanwarkol Distt. Ghazipur when all the accused appellants are said to have fallen the wall by which a door had been closed by Rama Kant, father of the deceased Jai Ram Rai. It is said that appellant Madan Rai





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top