SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 585

B.M.LAL, R.K.MAHAJAN
VRINDA GUJARATI – Appellant
Versus
BAREILLY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Goyal, PANKAJ MITTAL, Sudhir Jaiswal

( 1 ) THESE two writ petitions are being disposed of by an order as we would like to lay down the principle regarding the escalation of price with respect to the houses constructed by the Bareilly Development Authority and the U. P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad.

( 2 ) IT is to be mentioned that social schemes for providing houses to various type of groups i. e. High Income Group (HIG); Middle Income Group (MIG) and Lower Income Group (LIG) have been evolved. The houses are constructed by the State functionaries after acquiring the land. Since the citizens are not able to construct the houses on account of so many factors, the State wants through its instrumentalities to construct developed planned colonies of houses at reasonable rate and also to fulfil the obligation to provide shelter under the Constitution of India.

( 3 ) THE question which has been cropped up for consideration is that much time is elapsed between the registration of the applications for allotment of houses and the actual construction and delivery of possession thereafter. It is often seen that tentative period mentioned is three or five years but in actual practice, it takes long period ranging from five to ten yea
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top