SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 898

A.N.GUPTA
PAWAN KUMAR PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.S.MISHRA

A. N. GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner at present is lodged in District Jail, Lucknow in Case Crime No. 206/91 under Sections No. 147/148/149/302, IPC P. S. Aminabad, District Lucknow. The petitioner is also an accused in Case Crime No. 185/96 under Ss. 147/148/149/302/120-B, IPC, P. B. Kahrajganj, District Faizabad. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faizabad on 18-6-1996 has sent a production warrant, popularily known as warrant b to Superintendent, District Jail, Lucknow requiring him to produce the petitioner in his Court in Case Crime No. 185 of 1996. A copy of production warrant has been sent to the C. J. M. , Lucknow also. However, in pursuance of this production warrant, the petitioner has not been produced before Faizabad Court and he continues to be lodged in District Jail, Lucknow.

( 2 ) THE petitioner applied before C. J. M. Faizabad for bail in Case Crime No. 185 of 1996 referred to above. Bail application of the petitioner has been rejected by C. J. M. , Faizabad by his impugned order dated 25-6-96 in which it has been mentioned that since the petitioner is not in custody of the Court, his bail application cannot be considered. Aggrieved by it, the petitioner approached this Co


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top