SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 870

GIRIDHAR MALAVIYA, J.C.MISHRA
BAIJNATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHAGVAN PRASAD GUPTA, J.S.SANGAR, R.C.DIPAK

J. C. MISHRA, J.

( 1 ) THE accused Baijnath, Sukh Lal, Phoolchand and Natthu were convicted under Section 302/34, I. P. C. and sentenced to life imprisonment by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Jalaun at Orai in S. T. No. 74 of 1977. The informant Bansilal (P. W. 1) is brother of the deceased Hiralal. They were sons of Gutai. Sisters of Natthu were married to the deceased Hiralal, accused Sukhlal and accused Baijnath. The accused Phoolchand happens to be sisters son of accused Natthu.

( 2 ) THE accused Natthu was married to Smt. Premwati alias Lalli (P. W. 5) and they lived together in Mohalla Chamanganj, District Kanpur. The father of accused Natthu was employed in Swedeshi Mill, Kanpur and he was maintaining his son, who had no source of livelihood. He died in the year 1969. After his death accused Natthu, who had no earning to meet day to day expenses was facing financial problems, which were aggravated by his habit of drinking and gambling. He started pressurising his wife Smt. Premwati to take up prostitution and started bringing persons to his house for that purpose. She refused to oblige and declined the suggestion. The accused felt offended, he started beating her. She wa

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top