SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 1034

J.C.GUPTA
GAJENDRA KUMAR PATEL – Appellant
Versus
UTTAR PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE TRIBUNAL NO. III – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Janardan Sahai

J. C. GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) BY means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the quashing of the termination order dated November 14, 1984 contained in Annexure-6 to the writ petition, to issue direction to reinstate the petitioner in the service, to pay him the arrears of salary and allowances and confer consequential benefits of seniority etc. as if the termination order had never been made. It has also been prayed that a writ of mandamus be issued commanding the respondents to make a requisite order allowing the petitioner to cross the efficiency bar at the stage of Rs. 1770/- with effect from July 1, 1984.

( 2 ) THE petitioner under the order of the Managing Director of the Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam limited (hereinafter referred to as the nigam) dated January 4, 1978, was appointed as Finance manager after the approval of the State Government, He was initially appointed temporarily on one years probation. The appointment letter provided that his services would be terminated at any time on one months notice or on payment of one months salary in lieu of notice. It is stated that on June 18, 1979 the petitioner was promoted to the next higher grade with the approval of the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top