IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
BRIJESH KUMAR
HAJI MOHD.WASIM - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
CRI. MISC. 545 Of 1990
Decided On : 02/08/1991
BAIL - SECTION 437, CR. P. C. - SECTION 169, CR. P. C. - SECTION 170, CR. P. C. - SECTION 209, CR. P. C. - Bail granted by a Police Officer under Section 437, Cr. P. C. does not continue till the conclusion of the trial. The power of a Police Officer to grant bail ends with the conclusion of the investigation, except in cases where the sufficient evidence is only that of a bailable offence.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners were granted bail by the Police Officer in charge of the Police Station. After the charge sheet was submitted, the petitioners moved an application before the Magistrate for exemption of their personal appearance, relying on the bail granted by the Police Officer. The Magistrate rejected the application and ordered for issuance of non-bailable warrants against the petitioners.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the bail granted by a Police Officer under Section 437, Cr. P. C. does not continue till the conclusion of the trial. The power of a Police Officer to grant bail ends with the conclusion of the investigation, except in cases where the sufficient evidence is only that of a bailable offence.
Issues: Whether the bail granted by a Police Officer under Section 437, Cr. P. C. continues till the conclusion of the trial.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 437, Cr. P. C. along with other relevant provisions such as Sections 169, 170, and 209, Cr. P. C. It held that the power of a Police Officer to grant bail is limited to the investigation stage, and that once the investigation is complete, the accused must obtain bail from the Magistrate.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, upholding the Magistrate's order for issuance of non-bailable warrants against the petitioners.
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can analyze it and generate the key points with the appropriate references as specified.
( 1 ) BY means of this petition under S. 482, Cr. P. C. the petitoners have challenged the order dated 22-10-90 passed by the Chief Judicial, Magistrate, Rae Bareli incase No. 1174 of 1990. By means of the said order, the application moved on behalf of the petitioners for exemption of their attendance was rejected and an order was passed for issue of non bailable warrants against the petitioners.
( 2 ) IT appears that F. I. R. had been lodged against the petitioner accused-persons under Sections 147, 323, 324, 336, 307 and 426, I. P. C. at Police Station, Nasirabad, District Rae Bareli. It also appears that the accused petitioners were granted bail at the Police Station by Officer in charge. Thereafter, it appears that a charge-sheet was submitted. On the date fixed, an application was moved before the Magistrate to the effect that the petitioner, accused-persons, were on bail and, were putting in appearance through their counsel. They also prayed for exemption of their personal appearance on that date. It was also pleaded in the application that the applicants were not required to seek further bail as they continued to be on bail as granted by the Police Officer in charge of the Police Station, even though the cognizance of the case was taken by the Court of the Judicial Magistrate. This application was rejected by the learned Magistrate and it was observed that it appeared that the accused applicants were under some misconception that they were not required to obtain bail from the Court since they had already been released on bail by the Police Officer-in charge. With the above observations the learned Magistrate rejected the application praying for exemption and ordered for issue of non-bailable warrants for securing their attendance.
( 3 ) THE main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that once they have been granted bail by a Police Officer, they are entitled to remain on bail all through up to the trial of the case and under the law they were not required to obtain a fresh bail order from the Court. It was submitted that merely for the fact that the Court of the Magistrate had taken cognizance of the offence on filing of the charge sheet by the Police does not mean that bail granted by the Police Officer-in charge would come to an end. In this connection Section 437, Cr. P. C. has been pressed into service. Relevant sub-sections relied upon read as follows:-"437. When bail may be taken in case of non-bailable offence- (1) When any person accused of, or suspected of, the commission of any non-bailable offence is arrested or detained without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station, or appears or is brought before a Court other than the High Couert or Court of Session, he may be released on bail, but. (I) and (ii ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) If it appears to such officer or Court at any stage of the investigation, inquiry or trial, as the case may be, that there are not reasonable grounds for believing that the accused has committed a non-bailable offence, but that there are sufficient grounds for further inquiry into his guilt, the accused shall, subject to the provisions of Section 446a and pending such inquiry, be released on bail, or, at the discretion of such officer or Court, on the execution by him of a bond without sureties for his appearance as hereinafter provided. (3) to (7 ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
( 4 ) ON the basis of the above provisions it has been submitted that the said provisions do not differentiate between the bail granted by a Police Officer or by a Court, both orders stand at par. Once a bail has been granted by a Police Officer it will hold good until conclusion of the trial. The submission is that like the Courts the Police Officer is also entitled to grant bail at any stage of the proceedings, namely investigation, inquiry or trial.
( 5 ) IT is difficult to accept the co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.