SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 106

ALOK KUMAR BASU
V. KOTHARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.Behl

ALOK KUMAR BASU, J.


( 1 ) BOTH the aforesaid applications arise out of the complaint filed by the opposite party No. 2 Sudhir Chopra numbered as Complaint Case No. 2617/89 u/ss. 420/ 406/120-B, IPC. of the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, against the 11 accused, the applicant V. Kothari and M/s. Sunds Defibrator AB, being accused Nos. 1 and 11 respectively. In both the cases State of U. P. and Sudhir Chopra are opposite parties Nos. 1 and 2 respectively. Since these two applications relate to the same complainant case, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this judgment.

( 2 ) SUDHIR Chopra claimed himself to be the Vice President of a Company known as Best Boards Limited having its factory at Gajraula, Police Station Gajraula District Moradabad, U. P. The allegations in the complaint in short are that M / s Sunds Defibrator AB is a company with its registered office at Sweden. This company works in India through its representatives such as accused Nos. 4 to 10. There is another company arrayed as accused No. 3 while accused Nos. 1 and 2 are its executives and managers. An agreement was entered into between the complainant Company with the accused who a























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top