SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 406

B.P.SINGH
JODH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.AGRAWAL, H.C.NAYAK

B. P. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) JODH Singh and two others have filed this application for revision against the order dated 13-6-1990 passed by IInd Additional C. J. M. Jhansi in Criminal case No. 1434 of 1990.

( 2 ) SMT. Indra, wife of Bulbinder Singh, had filed a criminal complaint against Jodh Singh, Smt. Amrit Kaur and Har Prasad, u/s. 500, IPC in the Court of IInd Additional C. J. M. Jhansi. Learned magistrate had examined Smt. Indra u/s. 200, Cr. P. C. and witnesses Har Dayal Singh and Kanhaiya Jaiswal u/s. 202, Cr. P. C.

( 3 ) LEARNED A. C. J. M. , after going through the statement of the complainant and hearing the witnesses, was of the view that an offence u/s. 504, IPC was made out against Jodh Singh and others. Consequently, learned magistrate summoned the applicants vide order dated 13-6-1990. Aggrieved by the order of the learned magistrate, Jodh Singh and others have come in revision.

( 4 ) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case. The main contention of the learned counsel for the applicants is that on the basis of the allegations made in the complaint as well as in the statements of the witnesses, no offence u/s. 504, IPC was mad






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top