B.P.SINGH
JODH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) JODH Singh and two others have filed this application for revision against the order dated 13-6-1990 passed by IInd Additional C. J. M. Jhansi in Criminal case No. 1434 of 1990.
( 2 ) SMT. Indra, wife of Bulbinder Singh, had filed a criminal complaint against Jodh Singh, Smt. Amrit Kaur and Har Prasad, u/s. 500, IPC in the Court of IInd Additional C. J. M. Jhansi. Learned magistrate had examined Smt. Indra u/s. 200, Cr. P. C. and witnesses Har Dayal Singh and Kanhaiya Jaiswal u/s. 202, Cr. P. C.
( 3 ) LEARNED A. C. J. M. , after going through the statement of the complainant and hearing the witnesses, was of the view that an offence u/s. 504, IPC was made out against Jodh Singh and others. Consequently, learned magistrate summoned the applicants vide order dated 13-6-1990. Aggrieved by the order of the learned magistrate, Jodh Singh and others have come in revision.
( 4 ) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case. The main contention of the learned counsel for the applicants is that on the basis of the allegations made in the complaint as well as in the statements of the witnesses, no offence u/s. 504, IPC was mad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.