SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 507

S.R.SINGH
HEERA LAL VARMA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, KUMAUN MANDAL, NAINITAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.C.Kandpal

S. R. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER, Heera Lal Verma, held a fire-arm licence, it being licence No. 35054, under the authority of which he acquired 588l gun No. Ya 20707. By means of a notice dated 10-11-1986, he was required to show cause as to why the said licence be not cancelled. The relevant portion of the notice as reproduced below, enlists in all five grounds for cancelling the licence issued to the petitioner. The petitioner put in reply to the allegations made in the aforesaid show cause notice and at the same time he deposited the fire arm in the Malkhana. In reply, the petitioner repudiated the allegations made in the show cause notice and stated that his son Rajendra Lal Varma was murdered by one Vikrarn Singh, a suspended Patwari and son-in-law of one Jagdish Singh Boara; that no enquiry whatsoever was held by the Sub Divisional Magistrate as alleged, and that he never misbehaved with the Sub Divisional Magistrate, namely A. S. Nayal, and on the contrary, it was alleged that Sri Nayal had been won over by Sri Jagdish Singh Boara, who claimed Sri Nayal as his relative. According to the petitioner, his son having been murdered, the fire-arm was practically necessary for the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top