SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 503

R.S.DHAVAN
BIRENDRA KUMAR RAI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.P.SRIVASTAV, S.S.BHATNAGAR, SHIVAJI MISHRA

RAVI S. DHAVAN, J.

( 1 ) THE Proceedings before this court are by nomination of the Honble the Chief Justice upon a difference of opinion between two Honble Judges, who after having delivered their judgments desires the Honble the Chief Justice to place the matter before a third judge.

( 2 ) A situation like this occurred in this court more than 100 years ago to which this court will refer to later. but, at the present moment it would be best to take recourse to the charter of this court known as Rules of the Court, 1952, the successor to the Letters Patent which established the High Court. The situation has arisen as learned counsel arguing for the petitioner has cautioned the court that he has reservation that the reference which has been made may not be compatible with the High Court Rules and it may not be misunderstood later that the situation was not brought to the courts notice.

( 3 ) AT present, the court is not going into the merits of the matter. Suffice it to say that the Bench comprising of the Honble Girdhar Malviya, J. and the Honble K. K. Chaubey, J rendered a decision signed, sealed and delivered on the same day being 23/04/1991. The Honlble Presiding Judge allowed t

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top