R.S.DHAVAN
BIRENDRA KUMAR RAI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Proceedings before this court are by nomination of the Honble the Chief Justice upon a difference of opinion between two Honble Judges, who after having delivered their judgments desires the Honble the Chief Justice to place the matter before a third judge.
( 2 ) A situation like this occurred in this court more than 100 years ago to which this court will refer to later. but, at the present moment it would be best to take recourse to the charter of this court known as Rules of the Court, 1952, the successor to the Letters Patent which established the High Court. The situation has arisen as learned counsel arguing for the petitioner has cautioned the court that he has reservation that the reference which has been made may not be compatible with the High Court Rules and it may not be misunderstood later that the situation was not brought to the courts notice.
( 3 ) AT present, the court is not going into the merits of the matter. Suffice it to say that the Bench comprising of the Honble Girdhar Malviya, J. and the Honble K. K. Chaubey, J rendered a decision signed, sealed and delivered on the same day being 23/04/1991. The Honlble Presiding Judge allowed t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.