SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 735

N.L.GANGULY
TRILOCHAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KULJIT KAUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Bisariya

N. L. GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 15. 5. 1990 passed by the Chief Judge, Family court, Kanpur City, by which the family Court has passed orders under Section 94 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 151 and directed Air Marshal, Head Quarters, Air Force building, New Delhi, not to pay the provident fund and gratuity and pension etc. payable to the applicant, Trilochan Singh who was retiring on 23. 5. 1990. Against the said order, the present revision has been filed. This Court was pleased to direct the applicant to serve the respondents, respondent No. 1 is represented by Sri K. K. Tripathi.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. List has been revised. Learned Counsel for the opposite parties Sri K. K. Tripathi is not present In the Court.

( 3 ) A ex-parte decree for divorce was passed by the family Court on the application of the applicant, Sardar Trilochan Singh, decreeing the dirvorce case against Smt. Kuljeet Kaur. Restoration application against the ex-parte decree was filed by Smt. Kaur which is pending and has not been restored to its original number. In the mean time, it appears that an application was mo






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top