B.P.SINGH
BRIJESHWAR DAYAL VERMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) AN application for bail (Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 4771 of 1990) was moved on behalf of Kaya Prakash, who is being prosecuted for committing the offence under Sections 498-A, 304-B, IPC and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, P. S. Murad Nagar, district Ghaziabad.
( 2 ) THE allegation in the affidavit of Pramod Kumar, which was filed along with the bail application, was that Anand Prakash was married to Smt. Santosh about 8 years back. The bail application was allowed on 25-4-1990.
( 3 ) NOW Brijeshwar Dayal Varma, the first informant of the case, has applied for cancellation of the bail. The notice of this application for cancellation of bail was served upon the accused and he has filed a counter-affidavit in reply to the application for cancellation of bail.
( 4 ) THE main ground of the applicant Brijeshwar Dayal Varma is that there was a mis-statement of fact in the affidavit of Pramod Kumar regarding the time as to when the marriage of the deceased had taken place with Anand Prakash. Pramod Kumar had alleged in the affidavit that the said marriage took place about 8 years back while the fact was that the said marriage between Smt. Santosh and Anand Prak
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.