SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 755

D.P.S.CHAUHAN
DEVESH CHANDRA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
DINA NATH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Srivastava, P.C.Mathur, V.K.Gupta

D. P. S. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff-appellant of Suit No. 437 of 1981, Devesh Chandra Gupta, claimed the following reliefs in the suit :-" (A) That by a decree of possession against the defendants and in favour of the plaintiff, the defendants be evicted from the property as detailed at the foot of the plaint in Schedule A and B and the plaintiff be put in actual and physical possession thereof after total eviction of defendants therefrom. (B) That a decree for recovery of Rs. 2,705. 00 as rent and damages for use and occupation since 1-1-1980 to 20-10-1981 be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants first set; (C) That a decree for recovery of pendente lite and future damages for use and occupation at the rate of Rs. 300. 00 P. M. viz. at the present rental value of the suit property be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants first set on payment of additional court-fee in execution side; (D) That the costs of the suit be also awarded to the plaintiff against the defendants; (E) Any other relief/ reliefs which may be found suitable and proper in the opinion of the Court may also be awarded to the plaintiff. "

( 2 ) THE suit was decreed by the tr




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top