V.N.MEHROTRA
SHOBHA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a second bail application moved by Applicant Shobha Ram in a case under Ss. 302/ 307/ 452, I. P. C. The first bail application which was moved by the present applicant and one Kishan Pal was rejected by me on merits on 11-3-1991.
( 2 ) THE present bail application has been moved on the ground that after the rejection of first bail application moved by the applicant, bail has been granted to co-accused Chandra Pal by Honble Mr. Justice N. L. Ganguli on 20-7-1991. It is argued that the case of the present applicant is identical to that of the co-accused Chandra Pal and on the ground of parity, the applicant should also be granted bail.
( 3 ) ON behalf of the complainant as well as the State, it has been asserted that after the rejection of the first bail application moved by the present applicant, one application by another co-accused was rejected by Honble Mr. Justice K. K. Chaubey and this fact was not brought to the notice of Honble Mr. Justice N. L. Ganguli when the bail application of co-accused Chandra Pal was allowed. It is contended that in such circumstances, the ground of parity will not be available to the present applicant. On behalf of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.