SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(All) 65

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
V. K. Khanna and M. L. Bhat, JJ.
HARVANSH SAHAI SRIVASTAVA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
C. M. W. P. 2358 Of 1988
Decided On : 01/25/1990

Advocates Appeared:
S.A.Ansari

Rule 5 of the U. P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 is not discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

Headnote:

U. P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 - Rule 5 - Validity - Rule 5 of the U. P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974, which provides for the recruitment of a member of the family of a deceased Government servant who dies in harness, is not discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's father, a U. D. A. in Section Administrative -B of the Allahabad High Court, died in harness in 1973. The petitioner, who was a minor at the time of his father's death, applied for employment under the U. P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 (the Rules) in 1985. His application was rejected on the ground that it was not covered by the provisions of the Rules.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the petitioner was not entitled to any relief under the Rules as he had applied for employment more than 9 years after the death of his father. The court also held that Rule 5 of the Rules, which provides for the recruitment of a member of the family of a deceased Government servant who dies in harness, is not discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

Issues: 1. Whether Rule 5 of the Rules is discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to any relief under the Rules.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Rule 5 of the Rules is not discriminatory as it provides for the recruitment of a member of the family of a deceased Government servant who dies in harness, irrespective of the date of death. 2. The petitioner is not entitled to any relief under the Rules as he applied for employment more than 9 years after the death of his father.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed.

V. K. KHANNA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this writ petition has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to recruit the petitioner in a suitable vacancy at the place of his father late Shri Ram dularey Lal Srivastava, U. D. A. Section Administrative B, Allahabad High Court in view of the provisions of the U. P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness rules, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules, 1974 ). It has also been prayed that, that part of the Rules, 1974 be declared as null and void which violates Article 14 of the Constitution of india.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts for the purposes of deciding the pesent writ petition are that the petitioners father late Sri Ram Dularey Lal Srivastava died on 8th August, 1973. At the time of his death he was employed in the High Court at Allahabad as U. D. A. in Section Administrative -B. According to the petitioner he is the only son of late Shri Ram Dularey Lal Sivastava and he was minor at the time of the death of his father. It has also been stated that the petitioners mother Smt. Chandra kal Devi is getting family pension of Rs. 331/- per month. The petitioner has obtained the degree of Bachelor of Arts from the Kanpur University in the year 1983. On 9th September, 1985 the petitioner made an application to the Honble Chief Justice, Allahabad High Court praying to give him employment at the place of his father or in any other suitable vacancy in view of the rules, 1974. Another application was given on 21st January, 1987 followed by another on 7th march 1987. It appears that the petitioner has also represented his case to the Union Government and the Registrar of this Court vide his letter dated 2nd May 1987 intimated that the representation of Shri Harvansh Sahai Srivastava was considered by the Court and that since the case was not covered by the provisions of Rules, 1974 he could not be given appointment and his representation had thus been rejected. A copy of the said letter has been filed along with the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent as C. A. I.

( 3 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner has in the present writ petition urged that Rule 5 of the rules, 1974 in so far as it states that "in case a Government servant dies in harness after the commencement of these Rules" is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and is ultra vires as it discriminates between dependents of the Government servants who died after the commencement of the Rules and those who died before the commencement of the Rules and the aforesaid classification is not based on any intelligible differentia and rational nexus to the provisions of Rule 5 and the object sought for by the Rules 1974.

( 4 ) THE Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State Government has, however, urged on behalf of the respondent that the petitioner is not entitled to any relief inasmuch as the application for seeking employment under the Rules has been made after about nine years of his fathers death.

( 5 ) THE Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness rules, 1974 have been framed in exercise of the powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India by the Governor of Uttar Pradesh regulating the recruitment of dependents of Government Servants dying harness. A bare perusal of the Rules would show that the intention in framing the Rules was to provide relief to the family of a person who died in harness and who requires help so that the family of the deceased after losing the bread earner may sustain itself. Rule 5 of the aforesaid Rules runs as follows:

"5. Recruitment of a member of the Family of the deceased: in case a Government servant dies in harness after the commencement of these Rules, one member of his family who is not already employed in the Central Government or a State government or a Corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government or a State government shall, on making an ap








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top